Measure P Approved for The Farm

At the November 3, 2020 election, Poway voters approved Measure P allowing the development of a master-planned sustainable community called “The Farm” with a maximum of 160 homes and at least 70.4 acres of permanent open space. A majority of the vote was needed to pass the measure and of the 22,826 votes cast, 62.6% were in-favor and 37.4% against.

San Diego County Registrar of Voters

San Diego County Registrar of Voters

The GVCA will be updating the community with information about cleanup of the property and a timeline for development as information becomes available from The Farm development team.

Resort Hotel at Maderas Golf Club

The owner of Maderas Golf Club, Sunroad Enterprises, is proposing to amend the plan governing the land use to allow a hotel with up to 140 rooms. As you may recall, several years ago they proposed a hotel with up to 240 rooms and it failed in a city wide vote. On November 17, 2020, City Council will hear the proposal and provide input and direction regarding Sunroad’s revised request. You can listen to the live City Council meeting via Zoom. The council meeting starts at 7pm on November 17 and can be watched live via the instruction here at https://www.poway.org/636/Council-Meetings.

concept sketch
Rendering.jpg



“The Farm” vs Privately Owned Open Space

The real question is: Will Poway’s Prop FF survive?

A debated question is why build “The Farm” on the land of the now closed StoneRidge Country Club rather than leave it as privately-owned open space? On the surface, it would seem desirable to leave the land as-is. However, keeping this privately-owned land as long-term open space rather than a housing development is dependent on the survival of Prop FF which requires voter approval to increase housing density. If Prof FF were to be overturned (more on that later), a high density housing development could be approved without voter say or local control. We are not being alarmist. This is grounded in the reality of the many legislative bills proposed and those approved by the State of California legislation, which could eventually lead to state lawmakers passing legislation that overturn local land use ordinances like Prop FF.

A little history

Back in the late 1980s, there was concern about out-of-control housing density in the newly created City of Poway. To address the concern, Prop FF was drafted with support from the GVCA. Prop FF provides that any land use decision which increases the residential density on commercial, manufacturing or residential land zoned RR-A, RR-B, or RR-C, O-S, or OS-R must be approved by a majority of the voters at an election. Basically, city council can not alone approve increases in residential density. In November 1988, Poway voters passed Prop FF which is codified as Ordinance 283.

Fast forward to today

The region and state have some of the highest housing prices and lowest affordability rates in the nation. The State of California legislature is on a mission to fix this through legislation and has introduced and passed a number of bills that are aimed at increasing the number of homes built and at more affordable prices while usurping local control.

What does this mean to Poway and Prop FF?

Poway is one of the few cities with an ordinance like Prop FF that puts changes in housing density decisions in the hands of the voters. However, the state legislature is moving in the direction of limiting local control by passing statewide housing initiatives which mandate cities to allow more and higher density housing with less environmental review. To date, much of the legislation has been related to areas with high levels of public transit services. It’s inevitable that the legislature will continue its quest to increase the housing supply and bring more affordability by disallowing local control ordinances like Prop FF.

Does any of this apply to the former StoneRidge County Club land?

Maybe. In September 2020 the State approved AB725, a land use bill that requires the City of Poway’s housing element to include an inventory of land suitable for residential development. Land suitable for residential development includes: “Sites zoned for non-residential use that can be redeveloped for residential use, and for which the housing element includes a program to rezone the site, as necessary, rezoned for, to permit residential use, including sites owned or leased by a city, county, or city and county.” The bill outlines high zoning densities to accommodate housing for lower income households.

Read the full bill here:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB725

Also passed in September is AB1851, which allows faith-based organizations to build affordable housing on their parking lots. Since churches are allowed as a permitted use in the OS-R zone, it might be possible for a faith-based owner to develop portions of the property into affordable housing. The legislation would reduce or eliminate various local parking requirements that would otherwise preclude development of housing, and prevent cities from forcing faith-based organizations to later make up lost parking spaces when a parking lot is developed for housing.

Read the full bill here:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB1851

How far will the state go in legislating land use?

In 2019, the state of California passed AB670 which requires cities to allow accessory dwelling units (aka ADUs or granny flats); prior to that, the city of Poway highly restricted ADUs. For more extreme state legislation, look no further than the state of Oregon which passed HB2001 which largely bans single-family zoning across the state. It legalizes the development of duplexes on land currently zoned single-family in all communities of 10,000 or more. The bill also allows for the construction of triplexes, fourplexes, row houses, and cottage clusters on what was single-family-zoned land in cities of 25,000 or more.

Read the full bills here:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB670
https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2001

What if the StoneRidge property stays privately owned OS-R zoned land?

The owner of StoneRidge, a Los Angeles developer, is in the business of buying closed golf courses and redeveloping them into housing. Will he let this one sit as open space forever? Our bet is NO. Rather, we expect he will use his resources and connections to pursue state legislation to allow housing on under-utilized land of closed golf courses with city’s having little or no local control.

Will the City of Poway spend its limited resources fighting the State of California to preserve Prop FF. Again, our bet is most likely NO. In-fact when asked about this very issue at our City Council Candidate Forum, all four stated Prop FF is vulnerable.

Read the candidates forum here:
https://www.gvca.info/news/2020/9/23/poway-city-council-pre-forum-questionnaire

Bottom line

If Measure P fails, it is unknown whether the City will still have the benefit of voter approval or City Council control over zoning and project approval on a future development. On the other hand, a voter-approved Measure P – which includes a land use “specific plan” and permanent deed restrictions for open space – would shield the property from future state legislation.

California Assembly Pre-Forum Questionnaire

The Green Valley Civic Association, Poway Chamber of Commerce, COX, and Poway Kiwanis partnered on two Virtual Candidates Forums to find out where candidates stand on important issues that will affect you and your community.

Q: Describe your personal/professional background

June Cutter: Mother / Attorney / Small Business Owner

Q: Why are you seeking this office?

June Cutter: I am running to make sure our community has a real voice in Sacramento, so that the interests of hard working Californians are placed above special interests. I want to be a champion for the middle class and ensure that future generations have the opportunity to succeed and build a beautiful future here in my home state.

Q: Do you support the California High Speed Rail project?

June Cutter: No.

Q: Proposition 15 – often referred to as Split Roll – would amend the California State Constitution to require most commercial properties to be taxed based on their market value, rather than a property's purchase price (as it has been done under Prop. 13 since 1978). Do you support or oppose Prop 15 and why?

June Cutter: I strongly oppose Proposition 15 aka “Split Roll.” Since its passage in 1978, Proposition 13 has kept our property tax rates reasonable and that has been a fundamental component in keeping California affordable for the vast majority of its residents. Split Roll is dangerous because it sets a precedent - once you remove Prop 13 protections from commercial properties, it becomes a lot easier to remove those same protections from residential properties, which will be detrimental to homeowners. Moreover, increasing commercial property taxes will impact small businesses and consumers - when commercial property taxes rise, those taxes are passed along to tenants; when rental costs rise, prices must be increased for consumers. By increasing the cost of living across the board, Proposition 15’s most detrimental impact will be on California’s hard working middle class. Lastly, I do not support tax increases because I believe that California’s state government does not have a revenue problem; it has a spending problem. Instead of raising taxes, we need to hold our government accountable for the manner in which it spends the astronomical amount of taxes it already collects.

Q: What are your thoughts on repealing Assembly Bill 5, requiring “gig” workers to be classified as employees?

June Cutter: I support a full repeal of AB-5. As an employment attorney by trade, I have carefully examined AB-5 and understand the in’s and out’s of why it is bad law. AB-5 is detrimental to both businesses and the workforce. It is a job killing piece of legislation that disproportionately impacts working mothers, disabled adults, and senior citizens seeking supplemental income. In essence, they have taken a sledgehammer to a purported problem that could have been solved with a scalpel, as demonstrated by the dozens of industry carve-outs they have subsequently legislated. Exemption from an onerous law should not be based upon which industries can afford the best lobbyists. AB-5 is a prime example of the disaster that ensues when special interests control our state legislature.

County Supervisor Pre-Forum Questionnaire

The Green Valley Civic Association, Poway Chamber of Commerce, COX, and Poway Kiwanis partnered on two Virtual Candidates Forums to find out where candidates stand on important issues that will affect you and your community.

Q: Describe your personal/professional background

Joel Anderson: Many of you know me and you have spoken to me in town at one of my many Community Coffees. I’ve participated at chamber events and have asked for your opinions before I voted on issues important to you. I have a track record of supporting the chamber and Poway in general. My twelve-year record in the legislature as an advocate for taxpayers and providing service to constituents who needed help resolving complex issues prepares me to serve on the board of Supervisors.

Steve Vaus: Growing up on a cattle ranch shaped my approach to life. When you have to get up at the crack of dawn to tend the cattle before you go to school you learn a little something about hard work. That lesson was only underscored when, early in my career, I went to work for Youth Development, Inc. YDI was the largest provider of private residential care facilities for troubled young men in San Diego County, and I oversaw all of their residential operations. But despite the importance of that work, my heart wasn’t really in social service – I wanted to pursue a career in the music business. And once again, my work ethic paid off. My company created music for some of the biggest tv shows, music stars, promotional events and advertisers. Later, as a recording artist I went on to win the highest awards in the industry. My wife Corrie and I have lived in Poway for over 27 years. We have four kids and six grandsons.

Q: Why are you seeking this office?

Joel Anderson: Lack of county leadership has led to businesses struggling to stay afloat during COVID, a mental health and homelessness crisis, out of control housing costs, too many taxes and fees, and traffic gridlock. As your Supervisor, I will fight for East County and our quality of life.

Steve Vaus: My track record as Mayor of Poway - always delivering balanced budgets, never increasing taxes, consistently being the safest city in the county, ranked #1 to raise a family, expanding housing opportunities while protecting and increasing open space - offers a great blueprint for the County. Additionally, my success as a small business owner (winning the highest awards in the industry) combined with my local and regional government experience uniquely qualifies me to be the next Supervisor for East County.

Q: What are your priorities as a Supervisor, both countywide and for District 2?

Joel Anderson: Over the years, I have been out talking to voters in East County about their concerns. Roads, the cost of living (housing) and homelessness (mental health) are at the top of the list. Politics doesn’t always have to be an us against them and I have proven it with my bipartisan work. We need to be laser focused on policies that lift our community and help address real problems that we are all facing like homelessness and high cost of living.

Steve Vaus: Public safety will always be my top priority. I am endorsed by the San Diego County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association and every law enforcement agency in the district, as well as Cal Fire firefighters, because I will make sure they have the resources to keep us safe. Maintaining strong fiscal discipline and protecting East County taxpayers is also a high priority for me. As Supervisor, I will oppose all tax increases, will always ensure balanced budgets and maintain prudent fiscal reserves to protect critical services during any future emergencies. I will also fight the effort by the Sacramento politicians to dismantle Proposition 13, the landmark initiative that keeps our property taxes low. And I will always fight for property rights. Finally, we need to fix the homelessness problem in San Diego County. That will be done by instituting effective, accountable programs that treat the causes of chronic homelessness. We must address the mental health problems so common among the homeless. And, we have to combat the rampant drug and alcohol abuse in the homeless population. As Supervisor, I will not allow homeless encampments to overtake public spaces such as parks and sidewalks. Keeping those areas clean and safe is an obligation of our government.

Q: How do you intend to address our regional transportation and infrastructure needs?

Joel Anderson: The transit needs of our county will not be solved exclusively by mass transit. Building a trolley from downtown to Ramona is not feasible. As taxpayers, we have been paying a ½ sales tax increase for 15 years to pay for these promised road and safety enhancements. I know that in Alpine, where I live, we want the road and safety improvements we were promised, not smoke and mirrors compromises. I’m tired of politicians at SANDAG selling out the taxpayers and it is time that we push back and demand to be treated fairly.

Steve Vaus: As Chair of SANDAG, I have worked closely with Santee Mayor Minto, El Cajon Mayor Wells, San Diego Mayor Faulconer and other East County leaders to budget $90 million to improve Highway 52, Highway 67, and other problem areas. I am committed to completion of the projects promised to voters in the TransNet initiative in 2004. Expanding transit is important also, particularly in the densely populated areas of the county. In Supervisor District 2, for example, the Grantville neighborhood is definitely well-suited to transit, given its location near SDSU and the new SDSU stadium complex. However, other areas of the county need improved and expanded freeways and highways. Most of Supervisor District 2 is in that category. As Supervisor, I will continue to fight to maintain critical funding for East County freeways and highways.

Q: As we fight the COVID-19 pandemic, do you believe the County should prioritize health concerns or businesses reopening?

Joel Anderson: I think the real question isn't choosing between business or human health. The real question is whether we are using medical science or political science to fight COVID. I believe if we start using medical science, we can open more businesses in less time while protecting at-risk vulnerable populations. The San Diego Medical Society endorsed me because I have a plan. Unfortunately, my plan can't be summed up in a sound bite.

Steve Vaus: First, it’s important to recognize that the rules are established by the State of California. That’s why I will push hard on the Governor’s office to allow more local control. This is not a one-size-fits-all pandemic, and local leaders should have more authority to set the terms in their communities. Regarding the balance of health concerns and business. I believe we have to do both. There are highly vulnerable populations that need to be protected. Senior care facilities are are good example. The county health officials need to be more aggressive in acting to ensure the safety of residents of congregate care settings.

I do believe that Poway has done a good job balancing safety and offering a lifeline to businesses. Under my leadership, our city council approved one of the first small business loan programs, setting aside $2 million from our reserve fund. Also, under my leadership we purchased 100 picnic tables and distributed them to local restaurants so they could continue their operation during the pandemic. I also initiated a program to allow small businesses to operate in our parks at no cost. That program has since been copied by the City and County of San Diego.

Q: How should the County of San Diego address the homelessness crisis?

Joel Anderson: In the legislature, I worked to bring millions of dollars in mental health funding to San Diego County and sadly our supervisors choose to not use it. When elected Supervisor, I will leverage my relationships in Sacramento to ensure our county receives its fair share of mental health and homelessness funding.

Steve Vaus: Addressing the homelessness crisis in San Diego County is one of my three top priorities as Supervisor. As I said earlier, we need to implement effective and accountable programs that treat the causes of chronic homelessness. Of particular importance is addressing the mental health problems that many homeless suffer from. Additionally, the county must do a better job of addressing the substance abuse so common among the homeless. Drug and alcohol use only worsens the problems associated with homelessness. But, it’s important to note that I will not allow homeless encampments to overtake public spaces. Parks, sidewalks and canyons are for the public to use and enjoy. Maintaining safe and clean public areas is a core obligation of local government.

Poway City Council: Pre-Forum Questionnaire

The Green Valley Civic Association, Poway Chamber of Commerce, COX, and Poway Kiwanis partnered on two Virtual Candidates Forums to find out where candidates stand on important issues that will affect you and your community.

Q: Describe your personal/professional background

  1. Phil Factor: Retired Teacher, Coach, and Counselor

  2. Caylin Frank: Born and raised in North County, I received my Bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of San Diego and began my career in public service with the US House of Representatives. I later went to the County of San Diego, where I served as a senior policy advisor for over a decade. When my husband and I moved to Poway to raise our family, I saw an opportunity to use my knowledge and experience to make my children's hometown great. I've proudly served on the Poway City Council since 2018. We have two children, a 2.5 year old daughter and a six month old son. I'm a proud member of Soroptimist International of Poway and work closely with the Poway Chamber of Commerce.

  3. Chris Olps: Systems Engineer

  4. Barry Leonard: Retired business owner/current City Councilmember

Q: Why are you seeking this office?

  1. Phil Factor: I am running for Poway City Council District 2, because I want to ensure the needs of the community come first. I moved to Poway over 40 years ago with my wife. We have raised our two sons here and it has been one of our greatest decisions ever. I am deeply rooted and devoted to the community. I have worked as a teacher for 42 years, as well as a counselor, coach, and community advocate. I have provided guidance and support to my students and their families. And going forward I want to do the same for my community.

  2. Caylin Frank: Choosing where to raise your children is a hugely important decision. When we chose Poway, it was because of it's community values, top-notch amenities and safe neighborhoods. With my background in local government and public policy, I am able to use that experience to be a better advocate for South Poway residents. As the only woman with young children on the council (or running), I represent a perspective that has not had a voice on the council in some time. Many people come to Poway and stay in Poway to raise their families and we need to think about the future of Poway for the next generation. South Poway is a wonderful community that is continuing to get even better and I will represent residents well as I continue to advocate for things like park improvements, safer streets, and better commercial destinations to enjoy.

  3. Chris Olps: South Poway has been unrepresented for far too long. I have been advocating for our values in issues like appointment reform, gerrymandered districts, preserving Big Stone Lodge, and most recently the Fairfield development.

  4. Barry Leonard: Continue to improve the City

Q: In light of recent calls for reforms to law enforcement policies and practices, where do you think Poway gets it right and where do you see room for improvement?

  1. Phil Factor: Poway is consider one of the safe places to live, thanks to our outstanding Sheriff Department. Most of our Sheriff Deputies have told me that they really like working for the City of Poway. The are well trained and true professionals. Reforms I would like to see. I would like to see them work more with getting to know our youth in positive ways. I would like to see them visit our students at Poway High and Abraxas, working on earning trust and respect through positive experiences. I also would like to see our Sheriff walk the communities and get to know the people in neighborhoods.

  2. Caylin Frank: First, I think Poway gets it right by contracting with the San Diego County Sheriff's Department. Not only is it the most fiscally responsible use of taxpayer dollars to provide law enforcement services, but we get a quality of service that would be hard to provide on our own. We also have access to important specialized units that may not be needed everyday, but are critical when the time comes. I have made it clear to our law enforcement leadership that they need be partners in our community and I think we saw that in the cooperation between deputies and protesters during our recent protests. There is always room for improvement and learning from past experiences. Communication between law enforcement and our residents can always be improved and it's important that our deputies have continued training in mental health intervention, homeless outreach, anti-bias education and de-escalation techniques.

  3. Chris Olps: Poway outsources to the county for law enforcement. This allows for reduced liability and a shared cost for more diverse resources. Poway can improve by using government allotted money that should be spent locally for resources such as mental health and homelessness, but that continues to be spent in other communities.

  4. Barry Leonard: Law Enforcement in Poway is under contract with the County for Sheriff services. The Sheriff Department in Poway continues to perform a difficult job in a very professional manner. Poway is consistently rated the safest city in the County. However, the cost of Public safety consumes a majority of our budget when added to the Poway Fire Dept. We need to be aware of the cost. The Sheriff Department provides a mix of specialized personnel to meet the unique needs of Poway. This includes traffic, patrol, detective and juvenile deputies and their support staff. Poway pays for a Deputy to be assigned at Poway High and to cover other Poway schools as needed. The City Council and City Manager determine the number of people and the mix of coverage. Policing is changing and our Deputies need to handle frequent calls that involve mental health and the increased use of drugs. These people are not necessarily criminals and require more sociology/psychology than law enforcement. Specialized positions like PERT are in constant demand to handle these calls. Better and more treatment facilities are also needed. It is not appropriate to say that all Law Enforcement needs to change. This is especially not true in Poway. The Sheriffs Department as a whole needs to review their tactics and personnel and make changes only where necessary.

Q: What is your position on future development of the land in the Hwy 67/Poway grade area?

  1. Phil Factor: I live on Iron Mountain Drive "In the City in the Country" I am absolutely against any future development that would alter the community up here. I have been a leader up in this region since 1988 protecting it as Poway's open rural space. NO on future development.

  2. Caylin Frank: A recent pre-development conference asked the city council to provide feedback on a proposed commercial orchid farm and residence on a parcel at this location. The feedback I shared was that this land is ideal for agriculture, but it should maintain our scenic corridor. Something like orchards or vineyards as opposed to large-scale commercial warehouses would be appropriate. I would especially like to see any kind of agricultural proposal include areas open to the public that might be used for educational opportunities and resident enjoyment.

  3. Chris Olps: These areas are all zoned either RR-A or OS. The city should be doing everything it can to preserve the integrity of the low zoning, and respect the intent of Prop FF.

  4. Barry Leonard: These properties are mostly 40 acre parcels and there is no city water/sewer available. We have only received one request for development in recent history. It was for large greenhouses on the corner of 67/Poway Rd. This City Council did not support it as it was inconsistent with the surrounding area and view scape. If a property owner wants to develop their land within the zoning requirements they have the right to do so. Commercial uses will require a Conditional Use Permit from the Council that may or may not be approved.

Q: What is your position on forming a City “Planning Commission” to help oversee developments in Poway?

  1. Phil Factor: This is Phil Factor's plan: I will Implement a Planning and Development Steering Committee which will allow the residence and businesses owner the opportunity share their thoughts. This will ensure shared decisions making with transparency. (My platform on the ballot....Poway City Council Meeting 9/15/2020 Item #13)

  2. Caylin Frank: In a small town like Poway, we do not need more bureaucracy. The City offers pre-development conferences for any project, which is not something all cities offer. This is a great opportunity for residents and councilmembers to evaluate future proposals before they come to the city council for a vote. The public and councilmembers can offer feedback, share concerns and make suggestions that the applicant can then incorporate into the project.

  3. Chris Olps: The City of Poway currently pays nearly $300 thousand dollars for an economic development director. Council frequently states that “Poway is almost built out”. I believe that a volunteer based planning commission, with representation from each district, is a more appropriate solution for an “almost built out” city than a single highly paid individual.

  4. Barry Leonard: The City Council acts as the Planning Commission. We form specific committees as necessary to gather community input when necessary. This was the case when the Poway Road Specific Plan was created to have a framework for future development along Poway Road.

Q: Prop FF, approved by Poway voters in 1988, requires voter approval of land use changes to certain property if such changes would increase the density or intensify the use permitted. Do you think the proposition is vulnerable to being challenged in the courts or by the state of California?

  1. Phil Factor: Prop FF has been one of the greatest safeguards for the Poway Community. I am concerned that it could be under future attack because of State mandates. I will do all I can as your next City Council Member to protect our City in the Country and stand behind Prop FF.

  2. Caylin Frank: I would not support any efforts to weaken or eliminate Prop FF. That said, the rhetoric and legislation from Sacramento is very concerning for voter approval initiatives like ours. The legislature continues to pass overreaching laws that erode local control and I would not rule out the possibility of Prop FF being evaluated by the courts.

  3. Chris Olps: Yes, I believe Prop FF is vulnerable.

  4. Barry Leonard: Absolutely. There is an effort by many of the Sacramento lawmakers to eliminate Local Control in all cities, especially in regard to housing density. Recently, a law was passed to allow Auxiliary Dwelling Units in single family neighborhoods. These ADUs can allow a home owner to add 1 or 2 additional housing units to an existing home without regard to parking or neighborhood opposition. Local City regulations are over ruled and relaxed permitting must be given. This also applies to private neighborhoods with HOA control. This law alone has the potential to change existing neighborhoods into crowded multifamily areas with no available parking. This past year there were many bills submitted to the legislature that would reduce Local Control and increase density in our Cities. One of these bills would have invalidated Poway's Prop FF. Many of them didn't get to the Governor due to the shortened session. I expect that these efforts will continue and that Prop FF will be declared an illegal anti housing measure.

Q: What has the City of Poway done well in response to COVID-19 and what could the city have done better to support its small businesses and citizens during this pandemic?

  1. Phil Factor: The Covid -19 has hurt our small /large business and citizens in Poway. This has been a struggle for everyone. I think our City has reached out and helped ( small business loans, restaurant tables for outdoor dining, non -fee open parks usage for fitness/exercise business/ and places of worship) the City has de-regulated signs to promote businesses. The City of Poway has promoted health and safety with reminder signs throughout the community. I think most of our residence did stay home from March- July and continue to wear masks when in public. PUSD is doing the best they can in working to educate our youth in school. Health Stats on Covid 19 are available daily so the public here is well informed. I think the old saying we "ALL NEED TO HANG IN THERE" together our City will get through this together.

  2. Caylin Frank: The City of Poway has taken unprecedented steps to support our local businesses and residents while following all state and county health orders. We created the small business loan program (PEARL) funded by our reserves and we eased restrictions to allow expanded outdoor operations. We've provided picnic tables on loan and offered a free signage kit to help businesses comply with required guidelines. We opened our parks to outdoor fitness classes and will be significantly expanding residents' ability to do city business online through new software programs. I will continue to work closely with the Chamber and our business community to support small businesses during this difficult time and into the future.

  3. Chris Olps: Poway has a serious problem with a very limited selection of internet providers. The pandemic has highlighted this problem to the extreme. The city needs to take action to resolve this. I propose Poway identify the internet as a public utility. The effects of this are significant as it can help with budget issues, create jobs, benefit small businesses, residents working from home and students.

  4. Barry Leonard: The City of Poway is in the forefront of supporting our local businesses. We allocated $2m for low interest, small business loans intended to subsidize struggling businesses. We also created a program to provide free picnic tables to local restaurants and to relax the regulations on outside dining. These tables will be redeployed to our parks when no longer needed by the restaurants. The City also created a plan to allow local exercise businesses and houses of worship to use our open space in our parks. These programs have been beneficial to our businesses. The City of Poway is required to follow the directives of the Governor and the County Health Officer. As much as we may like to, we do not have the discretion to allow go against the higher powers.

Q: Proposition 15 – often referred to as Split Roll -- would amend the California State Constitution to require commercial and industrial properties, except those zoned as commercial agriculture, to be taxed based on their market value, rather than a property's purchase price, with annual increases equal to the rate of inflation or 2 percent, whichever is lower, as it has been done under the existing Prop 13. Do you support or oppose this proposition and why?

  1. Phil Factor: I am against Prop 15 because it is the wrong timing to implement this on businesses. Many business are struggling with the recession caused by the Covid -19. Businesses should not be taxed more. Let's find ways to help our business get back their earnings...not run them out of the State of California.

  2. Caylin Frank: I absolutely oppose Proposition 15, it would be devastating to our local businesses during a time when they are already struggling to survive. By creating skyrocketing and unpredictable property tax bills, businesses will see soaring rents and residents will see our high cost of living rise even higher as the cost of doing business grows. Proposition 15 is bad for business and bad for residents.

  3. Chris Olps: I have strong reservations based on past propositions from the state, that have been similar in nature. Funds have been misappropriated in the past furthering many of California’s budget issues. I have no position at this time, but I will be following this closely as it may provide additional city and school funding.

  4. Barry Leonard: This is an effort by Sacramento to tax all of us under the guise of equality. They claim it will only affect the big businesses and big landlords while small business owners will get a break and the schools will benefit. This is harmful to all. Big business and big landlords DO NOT PAY TAXES. Their taxes are passed along as higher prices and paid by their customers, you and me. Small business depends on big business to survive. Small business also rents from big landlords. Small business will hire less people and raise prices to pay higher rent. The average person will pay a high price if Prop 15 passes. Jobs will be lost. The taxpayers already pay for the schools but the funds are spent elsewhere instead of flowing to the classrooms. This formula needs to be fixed. The people behind Prop 15 have stated that they will come after homeowners next.

Q: List your top priorities as a Poway City Council member.

  1. Phil Factor: I, Phil Factor will be a representative who listens, cares, and works hard to find solutions with a collective focus. I will put people first. I will work for you.

  2. Caylin Frank: Public safety and ensuring our city remains the safest in the county.
    Supporting our small businesses and promoting our local economy. Advocating for park and open space enhancements and responsible revitalization of commercial centers. Protecting taxpayer dollars and ensuring they are spent wisely to best serve our residents. Focusing on our future by using long-term vision to keep our city thriving.

  3. Chris Olps: Infrastructure, Budget, Development

  4. Barry Leonard: Continue to keep our residents safe.
    Continue to improve the quality of life for all. Continue to spend less than we take in. Continue to hire and train incredible employees. Leave the City better than I found it.

PUSD Board Candidates: Pre-Forum Questionnaire

The Green Valley Civic Association, Poway Chamber of Commerce, COX, and Poway Kiwanis partnered on two Virtual Candidates Forums to find out where candidates stand on important issues that will affect you and your community.

Q: Describe your personal/professional background (i.e. schools your children attend(ed), profession, involvement in the PUSD community, etc.)

  1. Cindy Sytsma: After spending some time as a Correctional Deputy, I transitioned to education. I have been an educator for 22 years. I have taught all grades in both general and special ed. I have spent the last 16 years working at the university in both teacher credentialing courses and criminal justice courses. When my children entered the school, I jumped in with both feet to get involved. I have served on the PTA board every year, headed several committees, been a co-room parent every year, to name a few.

  2. Jimmy Karam: I’m a retired Navy Supply Corps Officer (Supply Corps Officers are essentially the business managers of the Navy). I have over 25-years of leadership experience in multiple disciplines to include Program Management, Government Contracting, Academic Administration, and Curriculum Development.
    My last tour in the Navy (2013-2016), I served at the United States Naval Academy (USNA) as the Economics Department Associate Chair. I’m currently an adjunct Economics Professor at Palomar College, teaching two sections of Economics at Escondido High as part of their Dual Enrollment program. As for my day job, I’m a Program Manager leading an Engineering staff of 40 plus people. My education includes a Bachelor of Science degree from USNA, an MBA from USC, and a Masters in Performance Psychology from National University. In addition to my academic, business and management experience, I’m also a member and certified mental performance consultant with the Association of Applied Sports Psychology. I was able to earn this certification after volunteering over 400 hours with the Poway High Football team for the past two years as their Leadership and Mental Skills coach. I've been married to Verena for over 20 years now, and we have literally lived all over the country, including a couple of years in Italy. We have lived in PUSD since 2007, with the exception of 2013-1016 when we lived in Annapolis, MD. Our children have attended Creekside Elementary, Garden Road Elementary, Twin Peaks Middle School, and Poway High School. • Lisa graduated from Poway High School in 2018 • Julian transferred from Palomar College to UC Davis and is remotely attending classes from the “Karam Campus” here in Poway • Emerson is attending Poway High School as a Freshmen via the Virtual Learning Academy (VLA) • Cooper is enjoying his time learning and socializing with friends at Garden Road Elementary via VLA. Verena has decided not to work this year so she can stay home and assist with Cooper’s little school pod of friends here on “Karam Campus”

  3. Darshana Patel: Professional: 
    • BA Occidental College • Ph.D. Biophysics, UC Irvine • Scientist, Genentech, Inc. Selected Board positions since 2010: • PUSD Board of Education Trustee (past President, VP, Clerk) • California School Boards Association (Delegate, Vice-Chair Legislation) • Rancho Peñasquitos Planning Board (Land Use, past Vice-Chair) • SDPD Police Captain’s Advisory Board • Executive board PVES PTA and Foundation My daughters attend Park Village Elementary, Mesa Verde Middle, and Westview High School.

  4. Tim Dougherty: Tim grew up in a small business environment in Southern New Jersey, where his father served on his local school board for 15 years. Tim went on to be a Div. I athlete and obtained a BSMEngineering and M. Eng. at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, PA.
    In New Jersey Tim has worked as a substitute teacher of Technology and wrestling coach at a middle school. Here in San Diego, Tim continued teaching through coaching the Torrey Pines youth wrestling team for several years. He now coaches softball for his daughters. Tim currently works as a Senior Director of Supply Chain for a local retailer where each year a group of senior industrial engineers works on a design project that he manages along with a USD faculty member. He is Lean/Six Sigma trained and has lead transformative large-scale projects, programs, and teams. Tim also is an adjunct at USD, teaching Manufacturing Processes. Tim knows what it’s like to be an online student, an online teacher, a business operator, and a parent. He hopes to use this knowledge and experience to make the Poway Unified School District even better for his daughters and his community.

Q: Why are you seeking this office?

  1. Cindy Sytsma: I have dedicated most of my adult life to schools and children programs. It would be a great honor to be able to continue to make a positive impact for children on a greater scale.

  2. Jimmy Karam: I bring a skill set that is unmatched by any other candidate and current board member. I believe my experiences in education, the military, and leadership can contribute to what our community needs in this time of uncertainty. We are going to be faced with great challenges in the next four years. Not only are we going to have to figure out how to deal with the second and third order effects of COVID-19, but we are also going to have to deal with financial struggles that many school districts are facing as we resist deficit spending practices. Looking forward, it is imperative for our future board members to provide fiscal oversight and carefully evaluate future spending decisions.  
    With over 25-years of leadership experience in multiple disciplines to include Program Management, Government Contracting, Academic Administration, and Curriculum Development, I have trained to figuratively parachute into organizations, quickly assess the requirements necessary to get the job done, and then make it happen. These skills have served me well as the Naval Academy's Economics Department Associate Chair, a Logistics Officer serving in the Mediterranean Sea, and an Adjunct Professor at Palomar College, and ensure my capability to lead as your School Board Trustee in these unprecedented times.

  3. Darshana Patel: I am running for a second term on the PUSD Board of Education because I am the proven leader with a track record of understanding complex issues, listening to families and students, and making informed decisions under difficult circumstances. I am fully dedicated to my role since advocating for public education is my passion.

  4. Tim Dougherty: PUSD has been celebrated for its educational excellence for years. This is why people seek our schools when establishing their families. However, in the recent past, significant challenges have prevented the improvement of the education. During my time in the District, I have not seen these challenges overcome nor have I seen defined measures of success for the Board. Covid has amplified the challenges and brought more our way. I want a better educational experience for our kids. I believe my skill set and years of experience in business, engineering, and education make me an ideal Trustee to represent the best interest of Area A.

Q: What are your thoughts on making distance at-home learning a permanent option for students?

  1. Cindy Sytsma: A parent’s educational choice is personal. If virtual school is the best fit for a family then it should remain an option. However, the majority of families believe that on campus learning is the right fit. Our kids thrive when they work in groups, socialize, learn how to handle conflict, join programs, etc. For many children, school is their safe place as sadly home is not their happy place. These kids need school for a safe human connection with teachers and friends who believe in them.

  2. Jimmy Karam: I’m a fan of Virtual Learning Academy as an option for parents, teachers, and students. I understand this option is not ideal for many, but there are a number of people that do prefer this method of learning. I honestly feel that my family personally has thrived in this environment. There are definitely ways we can improved virtual learning, but it has proven to be a viable option forward and should continue well passed COVID.

  3. Darshana Patel: We have invested significant time and resources in building a virtual platform at all grade levels. I am open to working with teachers, staff, and the community to determine whether we can make this a long-term option, perhaps through PUSD Alternative Programs, for example.

  4. Tim Dougherty: Absolutely, yes. If industry is any indication, remote working and learning are here to stay. The trick is…how much, who, and when? Face-to-face learning is always best. Depending on the age and subject, there are many courses that can be delivered online, be effective, and increase efficiency of students, teachers, and other resources. However, as we learned in the spring and now, it can be very complicated and require solutions outside of our comfort zone. I would propose the Virtual Learning Academy (virtual learning option) quickly appoint someone as a full-time leader of this important “school”. This role would have sole cross-department and cross-services responsibility for leading quick design iteration and implementation of the virtual learning experience while integrating it into traditional learning.

Q: With the rising costs of a four-year college education and pandemic restrictions to a traditional four-year college experience, many high school students are exploring alternative paths and options for their future careers and job opportunities. How can the district better support and address their needs?

  1. Cindy Sytsma: I know from years of extensive research and experience of working at all grades and with the vast exceptionalities of children, that as much as we would love for them to all go to college, it is not realistic. Our children are beautiful and talented in their own way. They need to expand their talents beyond core academics. They need programs such as the arts and trade programs to make them well-rounded individuals and better prepared with other outlets to handle the uncertainties that lie ahead.

  2. Jimmy Karam: PUSD should keep investing in Career Pathways and expand our relationship with Community Colleges. Career Pathways makes education relevant for our students. It provides exposure to many different opportunities outside of the traditional academic route. Career Pathways is ideal for closing the achievement gap. 
    In addition, PUSD needs to do a better job at incorporating Dual Enrollment Program with local community colleges. This is a great way for students to earn academic credit in high school and college.

  3. Darshana Patel: The District has already started expanding existing CTE programs and I am supporting ways to add more opportunities, such as a Middle College through a partnership with Palomar College. Also, we have a strong partnership with the Poway Chamber and my hope is that we can find ways to increase mentorship and internship opportunities.

  4. Tim Dougherty: This is exactly right. Like primary and secondary education, I believe the colleges and universities are facing big changes. Financially, many colleges and universities will be extremely challenged, and options could soon be different. Alternative paths and options for post-secondary education and careers needs to paramount. I think there is an opportunity for PUSD to create key partnerships with local colleges and business to creatively fund the education, training, and employment of our students simultaneously. Many employers already partially fund college tuitions. PUSD needs to engage advisors, local colleges, universities, trade schools and businesses immediately. In summary, I believe the end of high school, the beginning of training or college and/or the start of a career can happen in parallel over a longer period of time.

Q: Do you believe there are systemic issues of racial injustice present in the school district? If so, how should they be addressed?

  1. Cindy Sytsma: The definition of systemic, means affecting the whole body. No, I don’t believe there are systemic issues of racial injustice in the district. I do believe there are instances of racial injustice. If there is 1 instance that is too many. The path to the eradication of racial injustice starts with education. Curriculum needs to span the grades. Our district has beautiful diversity. Secondary schools have adopted “No Place for Hate,” our elementary schools have kindness week. It is a great start.

  2. Jimmy Karam: Yes, 100%! PUSD Board passed Resolution No. 116-2020 Reaffirming PUSD’s Commitment to Fight Racism and Correct Systemic Inequity, now is the time for follow through and action. I am quite pleased with the steps PUSD has taken since June with partnering with SDCOE’s Equity Department Coaches, strengthening discipline procedures, ensuring all sites engage in anti-bias training, etc.
    I still believe there is one aspect of confronting systemic racism that is missing from all the good things PUSD is accomplishing thus far. I believe our students still need a “Safe Place” to go to discuss and address their experiences. The Naval Academy has a similar program where faculty and staff can opt in for more formal training and then be certified as a “Safe Place” as annotated on their respective office/classroom door. When students experience an adverse experience (i.e. racial injustice, harassment, sexual assault, etc.), they now have a number of options to go to for help. The “Safe Place” program educates staff volunteers on how to speak with students in distress and then guide them through a series of protocols that are respectful of the parties involved in the incident.

  3. Darshana Patel: Yes. I am co-author of PUSD Board Resolution 116-2020, which directs the District to confront systemic racism. The resolution says the District will align resources to meet student needs and re-examine curriculum text selections, hiring practices, student discipline and program access through a partnership with students, staff, parents, and community. I have seen a draft of the plan and am looking forward to real change and accountability.

  4. Tim Dougherty: From our personal experience in the District, I say no. In the 3 years at our school, I have met new teachers, parents, and kids and experienced nothing but high respect and treatment of all races.
    That said, I understand there have recently been PUSD student incidents reported and introspection of the alignment of the number of teachers of certain races to students of the same race. I understand the Board is taking a close look at hiring practices to understand if there were also disproportionate applicants and qualified candidates. If qualified candidates were overlooked because of race; that is a problem. As for the student incidents, we need to use those as opportunities to educate those involved. I believe people are inherently good and deserve a chance to correct their actions. This education starts at home. Parents and students need to be accountable.

Q: What value do you place on the performing arts and what should the school district’s role be in supporting the Arts?

  1. Cindy Sytsma: I significantly value the performing arts. Both of my children are involved in music theater. My son has always been confident and outgoing. My older daughter has always struggled with low self-esteem and anxiety. After 1 year of music theater, her confidence and personality began to take hold. I wrote my dissertation on NCLB. As a special ed teacher, I place immense value in academics; many children struggle with reading, writing, and math. Performing arts allow children to shine in other ways.

  2. Jimmy Karam: In Maryland, my daughter picked up the viola as early as second grade. I see no reason to make this possible for our students in PUSD. I’m a big advocate for performing arts in our schools!
    PUSD can start by meeting the California State Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA) Standards. I’m not convinced PUSD is addressing this issue to the best of its abilities. I understand XPloration has been implemented to address the inequality of VAPA program in out elementary schools, but again I’m not convinced this is meeting state standards. Lastly, back in 2018 there was PUSD VAPA Task Force that provided recommendations on the best way to move forward in meeting state standards. PUSD needs to start there and take action on those recommendations.

  3. Darshana Patel: I am a patron of our PUSD visual and performing arts and have attended many high school performances throughout the district. The district formed a VAPA committee and it produced a 5-year Strategic Plan in 2019. Despite looming budgetary challenges, I am committed to continuing resource allocation to our VAPA programs at all grade levels.

  4. Tim Dougherty: I place a very high value on the Performing Arts. When I was young, there was no Theatre Arts program at my high school. Later in life, I grew an appreciation for the Theatre Arts, mostly from watching my sister-in-law build a Theatre Arts program from scratch, at that very same HS. Year over year, I am amazed at the talent and level of enthusiasm her students put into their annual musical. Studies show students who study the arts are four times more likely to be recognized for academic achievement. The District should encourage and support these programs. There are underutilized resources and businesses in local communities with whom we can develop creative partnerships to solve problems during these challenging times. These partnerships need to be financially viable.

Q: List your top priorities as a member of the PUSD Board of Education

  1. Cindy Sytsma: Improve both general and special education programs, build community involvement, foster inclusiveness and equity, and transparency.

  2. Jimmy Karam: 1) More counselors on campus to help with our children's social and emotional development by leveraging the community to proactively assist in helping our children with mental and life skills. 
    2) Improved Community Relations. PUSD needs to stop making top-down decisions that impact the community. 3) Confront Systemic Racism and Social Inequalities.

  3. Darshana Patel: My top priorities are:
    • Student equity and access in all school programs • Social-emotional wellness for our students at all grade levels • Advocacy for adequate public-school funding Visit www.patel4pusd.wordpress.com for more details

  4. Tim Dougherty: My top priorities for PUSD are Reopening/Post Covid Learning, Facilities/Land Use, and the Budget Deficit. They are separate but deeply intertwined. The pandemic has forced education to redesign its processes and delivery of education. This design must be able to iterate quickly. Vulnerable and young students, along with their parents, are feeling the brunt of school closures. The proposed bond measure to fix aging facilities failed in March. There is no new solution. Year after year, expenses outpace revenues, and Covid has amplified this problem. My experience and background make me uniquely qualified to address these major hurdles. I will create goals and KPIs for myself, tied to these and other priorities, so the voters can later measure my success.

The Farm in Poway: The Right Plan at the Right Time for Poway

by the GVCA Board - Steven Stone, Anita Edmondson, Jack Tripp, David Rauterkus, John DeSantis, Louise Ziminsky. The GVCA nor any board members have a financial interest in The Farm.

With the “No” vote outcome of the Measure A/StoneRidge special election in November 2017, the StoneRidge Country Club permanently closed and turned into a neglected eyesore of dead trees, fire prone brush, abandoned buildings, and vandalism. Since that time, a local investor and development team have come up with a proposed development called The Farm in Poway. Unlike prior land use change proposals, this one is tied to a Specific Plan that residents will be voting on in the November election. At the June 16, 2020 City Council meeting, council approved placing Measure P on the ballot. For the measure to pass it will require a majority of the voters approval.

This plan clearly defines the development with specifics on the homes, public facilities, roads, gardens, open space fields and trails. Most importantly, it provides permanent deed restrictions for open space and prohibits future increases in residential density.

As we have done since 1960 with many issues facing north Poway, the GVCA serves as a watchdog, a source of factual information, and an advocate for our members and the community. As The Farm in Poway concept evolved, we have hosted a community forum, undertaken surveys of our members, and held numerous meetings with City of Poway staff, the development team, and listened to the community’s questions and concerns.

In our evaluation of The Farm in Poway, we reviewed the Environmental Impact Report, details of the Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment, and considered impacts and mitigation measures for traffic, noise, schools, the loss of privately owned open space, fiscal impact to the city, and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods.

We also considered public benefits that this project may offer the community, such as a new community club, pool, tennis courts, walking and biking trails, meeting and entertainment amenities, and new housing options for local residents. We also weighed the value and positive impact of having a plan that would put the property back into local ownership, cleans up a blighted prominent property, and resolves the uncertainty around the future of the property.

The Farm in Poway Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment identify details and components of the development which are legally binding if Measure P passes. This brings a number of guaranteed benefits to the community, many of which would be funded by the local developer, Kevin McNamara.

 

THE FARM IN POWAY SITE PLAN

image.jpeg
 

Our Assessment

POSITIVE AND LOW IMPACTS

Aesthetics

  • Street improvements, including undergrounding of utilities and extended sidewalks along Espola Road

  • Removes fire and safety risks of existing structures and overgrown vegetation on interior of property

 

VISUAL SIMULATION OF ENTRANCE TO THE FARM IN POWAY AT ESPOLA RD AND MARTINCOIT RD

image.jpeg
 

ESPOLA ROAD LANDSCAPE SPACE EASEMENT

image.jpeg
 

Traffic

  • New synchronized, smart traffic signals along Espola Road will optimize traffic flow with fewer stop/start cycles

  • Relocated main entrance to the property at Martincoit Road will enhance traffic safety in and out of the development

  • EIR cites minimal cut-through traffic on Martincoit Road; most traffic expected to use new interior streets for circulation rather than existing streets

 

DETAIL RENDERING OF ENTRANCE TO THE FARM IN POWAY AT ESPOLA RD AND MARTINCOIT RD

image.jpeg
 

Noise

  • Proposed tennis courts will have a similar location and comparable impact on neighbors as tennis courts at the former StoneRidge Country Club.

  • To reduce traffic, noise and light impacts from commercial uses in the development, operating hours and noise constraints are defined in the Specific Plan.

School and Safety Services

  • EIR reports no significant impact on fire or sheriff services; additionally, the Poway Unified School District has confirmed available capacity.

Local ownership

  • Ballot measure approval immediately triggers ownership of property transfer from an out-of-town owner to a local developer and long-time resident of Poway.

 

PRESERVES OPEN SPACE, COMPARABLE DENSITY

  • The development designates more than 70 acres of open space (out of 117 total acres).

  • Permanent deed restrictions prohibit future increases in residential housing.

  • Density and design of the development is complementary to the local area and is comparable to nearby Vineland Hills (224 homes), Summerfield (173 homes), and StoneRidge condos (198 units).

PERMANENT DEED RESTRICTION

From City of Poway Resolution 20-052 approving Tentative Track Map, Development Review and Conditional Use Permit.

image.jpeg
 

LAND USE SUMMARY OF THE FARM IN POWAY

image.jpeg
 

COMMUNITY BENEFITS

  • Provides new housing options for local residents in a range of square footage, lot sizes and designs

  • Over 3.5 miles of new trails open to the public

  • Club house, pool, tennis courts available for public membership

  • Event and meeting rooms, food and beverage venue available to the public

  • Amphitheater, dog park, butterfly farm and educational center open to the public

OWNERSHIP, MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES, AND PUBLIC ACCESS

image.jpeg
 

NEGATIVE IMPACT

  • Throughout the pre-development process, the community expressed a number concerns to the GVCA, the developer and the City, primarily related to traffic and noise impacts.

  • We are satisfied that those concerns have been addressed with numerous mitigation efforts by the developer, including relocating some units close to existing homes, and increasing the buffer around the perimeter of the property to increase privacy and enhanced aesthetics.

 

ALTERNATIVE USES FOR CURRENT OS-R ZONING

  • The property is currently zoned Open Space-Recreation (OS-R). According to Poway City Code, other permitted and/ or conditional uses for this zoning include athletic fields/parks, churches, freestyle motor cross, lawn bowling, museums, rodeo arena, and skateboard parks.

  • Prior to the failed Measure A, the City evaluated purchasing the property for a municipal golf course and determined it was not economically feasible.

 

UNKNOWN FUTURE IF MEASURE FAILS

  • Owner, Michael Schlesinger, could continue allowing the property to decay into a greater fire hazard and eyesore.

  • The State could pass legislation or housing mandates requiring cities to allow development of high-density and/or affordable housing without voter approval.

  • It is possible that several years would elapse before another development is proposed. It is unknown whether the City will still have the benefit of voter approval or City Council control over zoning and project approval.

 

CONCLUSION

Our volunteer board of community members unanimously believes The Farm in Poway is the right project at the right time for Poway. We encourage residents to move beyond the divisiveness that arose from the prior ballot measure and shed the unrealistic notion that this private property could remain undeveloped or taken over by the City.

The StoneRidge Country Club was a thriving destination for families, golfers, tennis players, luncheons, banquets and large events for many years. With your support, this 117-acre property can once again be a prized public centerpiece of our community called The Farm in Poway.

 

MEASURE P ON THE BALLOT

image.jpeg

Virtual Candidates Forum via Zoom

SEPTEMBER 23 • SEPTEMBER 30 • 6 PM

The GVCA is proud to continue its long tradition of hosting candidates forums during general elections. Due to state restrictions for large gatherings, this year’s forums will be conducted virtually in partnership with the Poway Chamber of Commerce, Cox and Kiwanis of Poway.

The forums will be held live on September 23rd and September 30th at 6:00 pm. The taped events and additional candidate Q&A responses will be available online at www.GVCA.info and www.poway.com

To submit a question or topic for consideration, email us at president@gvca.info.

Wednesday, September 23 at 6pm

Poway Unified School District Board 
Area A: Darshana Patel (incumbent) & Tim Dougherty
Area E: Jimmy Karam & Cindy Sytsma

Poway City Council
District 2: Barry Leonard (incumbent) & Phil Factor
District 4: Caylin Frank (incumbent) & Chris Olps & Frank Fournier

Wednesday, September 30 at 6pm

San Diego County Board of Supervisors 
District 2: Steve Vaus (tentative) & Joel Anderson

California State Assembly 
77th District: Brian Maienschein (incumbent/tentative) & June Cutter



Voters facing big decisions need information, not emotion

2020 is shaping up to be a big year for Poway residents to make important decisions at the ballot box. Two upcoming ballot issues are contentious and divisive as their passage could impact the quality of life for many in our community. While emotion often plays into the decision- making process, we advocate for an informed approach – taking a step back to understand the facts without bias. Here, we take a look at two key issues voters are facing this year. And see our LMD update inside for information on an issue that is still alive and could return to the ballot in 2021.

MEASURE P:
$448 Million PUSD School Improvement Bond

Last fall, Poway Unified School District initiated a Facilities Master Plan process to evaluate and score the condition of all 39 school facilities in the district. The study determined that 62 percent (24 out of 39) of PUSD schools will be in “poor” condition by the year 2023.

GVCA_nwsltr-NEW_YEAR_2020-FINAL-revised_17Feb2020_pdf__page_1_of_4_.jpg

To help fund improvements to school facilities, the district has put forth a bond measure, the first since the billion dollar Prop U capital appreciation bond (CAB) was approved in 2008. On March 3rd voters across the entire Poway Unified School District region will vote on Measure P which seeks approval for $448,000,000 in bonds to improve classrooms, science labs, and career-training facilities that support college and preparation/career readiness.

  • Passage will require at least 55% of voter approval.

  • If the measure passes, property taxes for all homeowners in the PUSD region will increase $33.90 for every $100,000 of assessed value while the bonds are outstanding.

  • If approved, PUSD would be eligible for $90,000,000 in additional state matching funds.

  • The money from the bond measure cannot be used for salaries, benefits or pensions for administrators or teachers. However, it could free up money in the district’s general fund that would otherwise fund facilities needs and be used for other programs and positions.

  • This bond measure includes community facilities districts (CFDs) – communities that assess a Mello Roos Special Tax – because Mello Roos funds may not be used for the ongoing repair, improvement, or maintenance of school facilities; they can only fund the construction of new facilities projects.

The Farm in Poway

Another potential hot-button ballot measure could determine the fate of the former StoneRidge Country Club. If placed on the November 3rd ballot by City Council, all voters in the City of Poway will be asked to approve a measure allowing the rezoning and specific plan for the 117 acres of the StoneRidge Country Club property. The proposed project is known as the “The Farm in Poway” and would include:

  • 160 homes on 33.86 acres for an average of 4.7 dwellings per acre

  • A 4,246 sq ft community social center, 2,673 sq ft cafe with wine and beer garden, butterfly farm, athletic club with pool, tennis and pickleball courts

  • Project amenities will include a tot lot, community gardens, public trails, dog park, amphitheater, 15+ acres of agricultural fields, and 20+ acres of open space

  • The GVCA is moderating a Q&A event on Sunday, March 1st at 4:00 pm at Painted Rock Elementary School. The panel will includerepresentatives from the developer, consultants, and City staff who will answer audience questions about the project.

Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) UPDATE

Following the defeat of the ballot measures in May 2018 to create two new LMDs and assessments along Espola Road (86-1) and Twin Peaks Road (83-1), City Staff formed an LMD Advisory Group comprised of residents from both LMDs. The Advisory Group is working with KTU&A, a landscape consultant retained by the City, to obtain feedback from residents in LMD areas, draft a Master Landscape Plan, and communicate with the public.

Upcoming activities and public outreach include:

  • Survey in April 2020 to gain an understanding of how residents in the two LMDs feel about the condition of landscaping in their district and their priorities for future work.

  • Community workshops in June 2020 to obtain public input on the Master Landscape plan.

  • Dedicated LMD website available soon: www.powayLMD.com

Residents in these districts are encouraged to watch their mail for a postcard mailing on the upcoming survey and to contact the advisory group with questions at any time by emailing: powayLMDadvisory@gmail.com

EIR Report for The Farm finds no significant impacts

The Farm-EIR-web.jpg

The long awaited Environmental Impact Report "EIR" has been completed for "The Farm", a 160 home development slated for the 117 acre property of the former StoneRidge Country club. This draft report contains over 1,000 pages of analysis and appendices and was prepared by City approved consultants and engineers at the expense of the developer. The GVCA is in the process of reviewing the report and will be assessing the merits of the project along with community concerns before taking a formal position on the development.

The draft report concludes that the project "would result in significant impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation. However, these significant impacts would all be mitigated to a less-than-significant levels. The proposed project would not result in any significant and unavoidable impacts."

Community Discussion Forum | "The Farm in Poway" | September 10, 2019

The City of Poway has scheduled a Community Discussion Forum regarding "The Farm in Poway", a proposed development on the site of the former StoneRidge Country Club. The project applicant and consultants will be available to answer questions about the project's design, traffic impact and other concerns you may have.

"THE FARM" PUBLIC MEETING
Tuesday, September 10, 2019
6:30pm to 8:00pm
City of Poway City Council Chambers
13325 Civic Center Drive, Poway

City Council Approves funds for Landscape Map for LMDs

At the August 6, 2019 City Council Meeting, council approved about $86,000 in funding requested by the LMD Citizens Advisory Panel to create landscape conceptual plans for areas of the LMDS along Espola Road and Twin Peaks Road. The plan will be done by the city’s landscape architect take about six to nine months to complete. This plan is in preparation for a future vote of whether to approve new assessments for the two LMD districts. It will detail proposed improvements and outline expected cost to help voters decide.

Deadline for comments on The Farm at Poway EIR is Monday

The City of Poway has been seeking public comments for preparation of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed "The Farm at Poway" development. The GVCA has formally submitted this list of areas of concerns that should be evaluated in the EIR and mitigation actions proposed:

  1. Noise and lights resulting from the pool, tennis, club and parking lots

  2. Sight lines of existing homes compromised by new structures

  3. Traffic impact on Martincoit Road through to Stone Canyon

  4. Agricultural management impact (dust, fertilizer, chemicals, etc) resulting from the agri-fields

  5. Unwanted activity (noise, litter, criminal, etc) that may result from public access of the proposed trails

  6. Impact on schools and associated additional traffic to the schools

Have other concerns? Submit your comments to the City regarding items you want considered in the EIR by Monday, June 10th, 5pm to:

David De Vries, City Planner
City of Poway, Development Services
13325 Civic Center Dr.
Poway, CA 92064
email: ddevries@poway.org

Keeping an Eye on StoneRidge

Like many residents living on and near the golf course, the GVCA has been keeping a watchful eye on code compliance and other issues at the shuttered property, as well as the proposed “The Farm at Poway” redevelopment plan:

Weed/Fire Abatement

We contacted the City of Poway regarding weed abatement and fire code compliance at StoneRidge earlier this season. Code Compliance Officer Dan Welte informed us that he inspects the property once a month and notes any issues such as dead trees too close to adjacent properties and other areas of concern. The property owner has agreed to address current compliance issues by mid-June/July.

Officer Welte also said that brush conditions need to dry out before requiring the property owner to reduce the ground vegetation. He is not able to enforce cosmetic or appearance deficiencies of the course at this time. Residents can contact Officer Welte directly with any concerns regarding the property: DWelte@poway.org, (858) 668-4664.

Photo credit: Arlo Nugent video

Photo credit: Arlo Nugent video

Mosquito Larvae Control

After contacting the San Diego County Health Department-Vector Control this spring regarding mosquito larvae in the former StoneRidge pools and ponds, a representative from the Vector Control department responded immediately to inspect the property. He reported finding hundreds of live mosquito larvae active in the three water sources: the kiddie pool, spa and swimming pool.

The representative treated the three affected areas for immediate action and placed mosquito fish in the swimming pool to eat any future larvae.

The Farm at Poway timeline 6-2019.jpg

Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for The Farm at Poway

A new redevelopment plan called The Farm at Poway is working its way through the Prop FF process to place a Specific Plan and zoning change on the ballot in November 2020.

One of the first steps in the process is an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The report will address potential direct and cumulative impacts associated with a proposed development, including those issues raised by the public. A public scoping meeting was held in May to collect input from the community for consideration in the Draft EIR. From the May 2019 “Initial Study” by Dudek, an environmental engineering firm hired to handle the EIR, we have quoted the following questions posed regarding specific categories that potentially could have significant impact on the community, such as:

Would the project:

Aesthetics - Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?

Noise - Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?

Population and Housing - Induce substantial unplanned population growth?

Public Services - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police, schools, parks, other public services.

Transportation - Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? Result in inadequate emergency access?

A June 10th deadline was set for comments from the public to be considered for the EIR. There will be opportunities in the future for the public to review the report and provide further input.

Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs): The city-wide issue that won’t go away

GVCA_newsletter-SPRING_2019_v4_pdf__page_3_of_4_.jpg

What is an LMD?

Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) were created many years ago by developers as a way for property owners to pay for enhanced landscaping and improvements beyond those generally provided by the city. Each district is responsible for maintaining all irrigation and sprinkler systems, turf, trees, shrubs, and bushes in medians and public rights-of way. Monies collected from LMD assessments are set aside for the exclusive benefit of each district and can only be used for maintenance and improvement of that specific district. Many homeowners in north Poway are assessed on their property taxes under LMD 86-1. (To determine if your property is part of an LMD, check your property tax statement.)

What’s the problem?

No adjustments to these LMD assessments have been made since 1994. Since then, the cost of water, landscaping, tree removal, etc. has steadily and significantly risen. The City says the districts are facing critical budget shortfalls to adequately maintain these areas.

What happened since the vote failed?

In May 2018, homeowners in two LMDs (83-1 along Twin Peaks Rd. and 86-1 along Espola Rd.), received ballots to approve re-engineered district maps and increased/ new assessments. The proposals were overwhelmingly defeated in both districts. Then-city manager Tina White appointed an ad hoc LMD Advisory Committee comprised of 13 Poway residents from various areas of the community to review LMD 83-1 and 86-1 and provide recommendations. The committee has met more than a dozen times since October 2018. The committee’s recommendations were presented to City Council in March 2019. No decisions were made or actions taken at the time. NOTE: In the current fiscal year (2018-19), the City allocated $100,000 to the two LMDs for emergency tree removal and $165,530 in supplemental water from the general fund over and above its annual general benefit funding to fill the gap left by the LMDs’ insufficient funding.

What does the advisory committee recommend?

In order to return the LMDs to a state that is viable, manageable, and sustainable in the long term, the committee ultimately recommends the need for a successful re-ballot. However, its most pressing recommendation is for the preparation of a Landscape Master Plan (LMP). This coordinated, overarching strategy would:

  • designate a plan for managing the existing trees to reduce long-term maintenance;

  • provide concepts for low-maintenance, drought tolerant ground landscaping, including at the entrances, that can be implemented per an eventual funding plan;

  • create the basis for developing preliminary construction/implementation cost estimates that would inform future decision-making;

  • outline an overall strategy for reducing maintenance expenses;

  • initiate broader community support through public input meetings during preparation of the plan.

How would a Landscape Master Plan be funded?

The City is currently in the budget review process and early indications paint a discouraging picture.However, the committee has cited a number of possible funding options for an LMP (roughly estimated to cost $100,000-150,000), including the “surplus” City- provided LMD funding that the Council rolled over into next fiscal year at the May 7 council meeting, current LMD revenues, and possible loans to the LMDs.

Next steps: JULY 16th meeting

The committee is resolute that without a Landscape Master Plan in place, the City will be unable to move forward to resolve the under-funded and inadequate maintenance of LMD 83-1 and 86-1. The City will hold a public LMD Council Workshop on Tuesday, July 16th, 7:00 pm, at City Council Chambers at 13325 Civic Center Drive in Poway to discuss next steps. GVCA encourages all homeowners in north Poway, regardless of whether you are in a current LMD, to attend the workshop, get more information, and provide input.